주요메뉴 바로가기 본문 바로가기

주메뉴

IBS Conferences

Decoding Spontaneous Thoughts from the Brain via Machine Learning

- Predicting self-relevance and valence during personal narratives using fMRI and predictive modeling -

A team of researchers led by KIM Hong Ji and WOO Choong-Wan at the Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research (CNIR) within the Institute for Basic Science (IBS), in collaboration with Emily FINN at Dartmouth College, has unlocked a new realm of understanding within the human brain. The team demonstrated the possibility of using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and machine learning algorithms to predict subjective feelings in people’s thoughts while reading stories or in a freely thinking state.

The brain is constantly active, and spontaneous thoughts occur even during rest or sleep. These thoughts can be anything ranging from memories of the past to aspirations for the future, and they are often intertwined with emotions and personal concerns. However, because spontaneous thought typically occurs without any constraint of consciousness, researching them poses challenges—even simply asking individuals what they are currently thinking can change the nature of their thoughts.

New research suggests that it may be possible to develop predictive models of affective contents during spontaneous thought by combining personal narratives with fMRI. Narratives and spontaneous thoughts share similar characteristics, including rich semantic information and temporally unfolding nature. To capture a diverse range of thought patterns, participants engaged in one-on-one interviews to craft personalized narrative stimuli, reflecting their past experiences and emotions. While participants read their stories inside the MRI scanner, their brain activity was recorded.

After the fMRI scan, the participants were asked to read the stories again and report perceived self-relevance (i.e., how much this content is related to themselves) and valence (i.e., how much this content is positive or negative) at each moment. Using a quintile (five levels) from each participant's self-relevance and valence ratings, 25 (5 levels of self-relevance rating × 5 levels of valence rating) possible segments of fMRI and rating data were created. The team then harnessed machine learning techniques to train predictive models, combining these data with the fMRI brain scans from 49 individuals to decode the “emotional dimensions” of thoughts in real time.

To interpret the brain representations of the predictive models, the research team employed multiple approaches, such as virtual lesion and virtual isolation analyses at both region and network levels. Through these analyses, they discovered the significance of the default mode, ventral attention, and frontoparietal networks in both self-relevance and valence predictions. Specifically, they identified the involvement of the anterior insula and midcingulate cortex in self-relevance prediction, while the left temporoparietal junction and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex played important roles in valence prediction.

Moreover, the predictive models showed their capacity to predict both self-relevance and valence not only during story reading but also when applied to data from 199 individuals engaging in spontaneous, task-free thinking or even during resting. These findings show the promise of daydream decoding.

“Several tech companies and research teams are currently endeavoring to decode words or images directly from brain activity, but there are limited initiatives aimed at decoding intimate emotions underlying these thoughts,” stated Dr. WOO Choong-Wan, associate director of IBS, who led the study. “Our research is centered on human emotions, with the aim of decoding emotions within the natural flow of thoughts to obtain information that can benefit people’s mental health.”

KIM Hongji, a doctoral candidate and the first author of this study, emphasized, "This study holds significance as we decoded the emotional state associated with general thoughts, rather than targeting emotions limited to specific tasks," adding, "These findings advance our understanding of the internal states and contexts influencing subjective experiences, potentially shedding light on individual differences in thoughts and emotions, and aiding in the evaluation of mental well-being."

Figure 1. Predictive modeling analysis pipeline
            First, the data was independently segmented into quintiles (5 levels) for self-relevance and valence based on participant’s ratings. Next, time points (TRs) were assigned according to the levels of these two dimensions, resulting in a total of 5×5 quantized TR indices. Utilizing these indices, exemplified by level 2 for self-relevance and level 5 for valence highlighted as red-shaded TRs in the figure, each index's fMRI and rating data were averaged, thereby generating 25 fMRI images and corresponding rating data for each participant. Subsequently, employing these orthogonalized data, whole-brain pattern-based predictive models were developed using principal component regression (PCR) along with leave-one-subject-out cross-validation (LOSO-CV) and random-split cross-validation (RS-CV).
Figure 1. Predictive modeling analysis pipeline

First, the data was independently segmented into quintiles (5 levels) for self-relevance and valence based on participant’s ratings. Next, time points (TRs) were assigned according to the levels of these two dimensions, resulting in a total of 5×5 quantized TR indices. Utilizing these indices, exemplified by level 2 for self-relevance and level 5 for valence highlighted as red-shaded TRs in the figure, each index's fMRI and rating data were averaged, thereby generating 25 fMRI images and corresponding rating data for each participant. Subsequently, employing these orthogonalized data, whole-brain pattern-based predictive models were developed using principal component regression (PCR) along with leave-one-subject-out cross-validation (LOSO-CV) and random-split cross-validation (RS-CV).

Figure 2. Important features of the self-relevance and valence models (virtual isolation analysis)
            The brain maps shown in the left panel illustrate the results of searchlight-based virtual isolation analysis for the self-relevance (top) and the valence model (bottom). The plots in the right panel show the virtual isolation analysis results for the self-relevance model (top) and the valence model (bottom), incorporating large-scale networks and selected ROIs. Each colored dot represents the prediction-outcome correlations for each network or region with bootstrap tests of 10,000 iterations.
Figure 2. Important features of the self-relevance and valence models (virtual isolation analysis)

The brain maps shown in the left panel illustrate the results of searchlight-based virtual isolation analysis for the self-relevance (top) and the valence model (bottom). The plots in the right panel show the virtual isolation analysis results for the self-relevance model (top) and the valence model (bottom), incorporating large-scale networks and selected ROIs. Each colored dot represents the prediction-outcome correlations for each network or region with bootstrap tests of 10,000 iterations.

Notes for editors

- References
Hong Ji Kim, Byeol Kim Lux, Eunjin Lee, Emily S. Finn, Choong-Wan Woo. Brain decoding of spontaneous thought: predictive modeling of self-relevance and valence using personal narratives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2401959121


- Video abstract
https://youtu.be/wUr6apaRuAE?si=PvJQruv-8ZsrqjxJ


- Media Contact
For further information or to request media assistance, please contact Choong-Wan Woo at the Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS) (waniwoo@skku.edu)or William I. Suh at the IBS Public Relations Team (willisuh@ibs.re.kr).


- About the Institute for Basic Science (IBS)
IBS was founded in 2011 by the government of the Republic of Korea with the sole purpose of driving forward the development of basic science in South Korea. IBS has 7 research institutes and 30 research centers as of January 2024. There are eight physics, three mathematics, five chemistry, seven life science, two earth science, and five interdisciplinary research centers.


Research

Are you satisfied with the information on this page?

Content Manager
Public Relations Team : Yim Ji Yeob   042-878-8173
Last Update 2023-11-28 14:20